Is Your WA Account Pool Secure?! It's Time to Launch In-Depth Screening!

    In WhatsApp (abbreviated as WA) marketing and Amazon Digital Marketing: The Power and Challenges of Number Filteringcustomer management, most enterprises only focus on "account quantity" while ignoring the security risks of their account pools. A large number of stolen accounts, fake accounts, and non-compliant accounts are mixed in, which not only wastes marketing resources but also may trigger WA platform risk control, leading to the suspension of the enterprise's main account. WA account screening is precisely the core method to protect the security of account pools: through WA account screening, enterprises can accurately eliminate high-risk accounts and purify the account pool environment; relying on ITG Global Screening, a professional tool, they can achieve "in-depth, efficient, and comprehensive" screening, fundamentally solving the security issues of account pools. This article will analyze the security threats to WA account pools point by point and teach you how to use ITG Global Screening to launch in-depth screening, building a solid defense line for account security.

Low Efficiency, Unable to Handle Large-Scale Account Pools

    Current Situation: Traditional screening relies on manual checks of "account avatars, signatures, and login records" one by one. One person can only screen 500 WA accounts per day, and 100,000 accounts require 200 days, seriously delaying security inspection progress.

    Case: An enterprise with 50,000 WA accounts only completed the screening of 20,000 accounts after 20 days of manual work. During this period, risk control was triggered due to unscreened non-compliant accounts, resulting in more losses than gains.

    Core Issue: Efficiency is far lower than the update speed of account pools, leading to the continuous accumulation of security risks.

Insufficient Accuracy, Missing Hidden High-Risk Accounts

    High Misjudgment Rate: Manual judgment of "whether an account is stolen or non-compliant" relies on subjective experience, with a misjudgment rate exceeding 30%. Normal accounts may be misjudged as high-risk, or hidden non-compliant accounts may be missed.

    Technical Shortcomings: Unable to query core security data such as "historical non-compliance records", "associated device information", and "login IP trajectory" of accounts. Judgment can only be based on surface information, resulting in insufficient screening depth.

    Consequence: After an enterprise used traditional screening methods, 12% of high-risk accounts were still not eliminated. Subsequent promotions led to a large number of complaints, and the accounts were restricted from using functions.

Inability to Address Complex Security Threats, Single Screening Dimension

    Limitation Manifestation: Can only screen basic invalid accounts such as "empty accounts and unregistered accounts", but cannot identify complex high-risk accounts such as "stolen, fake, and non-compliant accounts".

    Comparison Data: Traditional screening can only solve 15%-20% of account pool security issues; professional WA account screening tools (such as ITG Global Screening) can solve over 90% of security issues.

    Conclusion: Traditional screening is like "scratching the surface through boots" and cannot fundamentally ensure the security of account pools.

(Editor: Encyclopedia)